Byron Dale v. Steven Mnuchin, No. 18-3193 (8th Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Per Curiam - Before Gruender, Shepherd and Stras, Circuit Judges] Civil case. Dismissal of complaint affirmed; pro se notice of appeal was only effective as to the party who signed it. [ March 28, 2019

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-3193 ___________________________ Byron Dale; Greg Soderberg; Ayrlahn Johnson; David Pich; The Citizens of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants v. Steven Mnuchin; President Donald Trump lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________ Submitted: March 26, 2019 Filed: March 29, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRUENDER, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Byron Dale appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record and Dale’s arguments on appeal, we conclude the court did not err in dismissing the complaint. See Laclede Gas Co. v. St. Charles Cnty., Mo., 713 F.3d 413, 417 (8th Cir. 2013) (de novo review of dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction). We also note that, as only Dale signed the notice of appeal, the other plaintiffs are not appellants in this court. See Scarrella v. Midwest Fed. Savings and Loan, 536 F.2d 1207, 1209 (8th Cir. 1976) (per curiam) (NOA that purported to be on behalf of all plaintiffs but was signed by only one pro se plaintiff was not effective for those who did not sign). ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Leo I. Brisbois, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.