Wise v. Department of Transportation, No. 18-3016 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this Case
Plaintiffs filed suit against federal and state agencies in a dispute over the widening of Interstate Highway 630, alleging violations of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., and NEPA's implementing regulations, 40 C.F.R. 1500-1508.
Determining that it had jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal, the Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of injunctive relief, holding that plaintiffs were unlikely to succeed on the merits of their claims. In this case, plaintiffs failed to show that the FHWA's determination that the project qualifies for a categorical exclusion from NEPA requirements because the project takes place entirely within the existing operational right-of-way was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion or otherwise not in accordance with law.
Court Description: Wollman, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Erickson, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Environmental law. The court has jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal as the district court's order had the practical effect of a denying a preliminary injunction; the district court did not err in concluding that plaintiff was not entitled to a preliminary injunction as he was unlikely to succeed on the merits; plaintiff failed to show that the agency's determination that the I-630 highway project took place entirely within the existing operational right-of-way and thus qualified for a categorical exclusion from NEPA's requirements under 23 C.F.R. 771.117(c)(22) was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion or otherwise not in accordance with law.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.