United States v. Sterling, No. 18-2974 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this Case
Defendant appealed his 125 month sentence imposed after he pleaded guilty to two counts of cocaine distribution and one count of conspiracy to distribute 28 grams or more of cocaine. The district court determined that defendant's base offense level was 26, based on unchallenged drug quantity facts stated in the Presentence Investigation Report (PSR).
The Eighth Circuit reversed in part, holding that the government failed to prove estimated drug quantity above base offense level 24 with information that "has sufficient indicia of reliability to support its probable accuracy." However, the court held that the district court did not err by imposing a two-level sentencing enhancement under USSG 2D1.1(b)(1) for possession of a dangerous weapon. Accordingly, the court remanded for resentencing.
Court Description: Loken, Author, with Kelly and Erickson, Circuit Judges] Criminal Case - sentence. In challenge to drug quantity determination and enhancement for possession of a dangerous weapon, the presentence investigation report attributed a drug quantity required for a base account of 24. The probation office concluded it was reasonable that defendants were held accountable for distribution of level 26 quantities. Sterling objected. The government did no present evidence to support discrepancy. Because the government failed to provide the information, the district court clearly erred in sentencing Sterling to a base offense level of 26 based on speculative drug quantities. The district court did not err in imposing the Guidelines sec 2D1.1(b)(1) enhancement. Case is reversed in part and remanded for resentencing.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.