Rudy Enriquez-Martinez v. William P. Barr, No. 18-2829 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Loken, Colloton and Grasz, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - Immigration. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner's motion to reopen.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-2829 ___________________________ Rudy Yaneth Enriquez-Martinez lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent ____________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ____________ Submitted: September 17, 2019 Filed: September 19, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Guatemalan citizen Rudy Enriquez-Martinez petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying her motion to reopen her removal proceedings. After careful review, we conclude the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Enriquez-Martinez’s motion. See Vargas v. Holder, 567 F.3d 387, 391 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). The petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
