Terrance Schrammen v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., No. 18-2464 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam. Before Erickson, Wollman, and Kobes, Circuit Judges] Civil Case - Retaliation. Grant of summary judgment is affirmed without comment. [ April 04, 2019
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-2464 ___________________________ Terrance Schrammen lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. ConAgra Foods, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________ Submitted: April 2, 2019 Filed: April 5, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before ERICKSON, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Terrance Schrammen appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se action asserting retaliation claims against his former employer, 1 The Honorable Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable David T. Schultz, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. ConAgra Foods, Inc. After careful de novo review, we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kunferman v. Ford Motor Co., 112 F.3d 962, 965 (8th Cir. 1997) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo; record is reviewed in light most favorable to nonmoving party). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
