Court Description: Per Curiam - Before Gruender, Bowman and Stras, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil commitment. Order committing Suleiman to the custody of the Attorney General of the United States for hospitalization based on a finding that he was suffering a mental disease or defect such that his release would create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to the property of another is supported by the record and is affirmed. Home | Contact Us | Employment | Glossary of Legal Terms | Site Map | RSS Privacy Policy|BrowseAloud
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-2462 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Abdifatah Suleiman lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield ____________ Submitted: February 22, 2019 Filed: March 1, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Abdifatah Suleiman appeals the district court’s1 order committing him under 18 U.S.C. § 4246 to the custody of the Attorney General for hospitalization after finding that he was suffering from a mental disease or defect such that his release would create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to the property of another. See 18 U.S.C. § 4246. After careful review of the factual determinations underlying the district court’s commitment decision for clear error, we affirm. See United States v. Williams, 299 F.3d 673, 676 (8th Cir. 2002). The commitment order is supported by medical opinions set forth in reports prepared by mental health professionals where Suleiman is presently confined for treatment and by defense counsel’s independent psychological examiner. The reports noted that Suleiman lacked insight into his medical condition, had irregular medication compliance, and engaged in psychotic and aggressive behaviors when released. Furthermore, the reports attributed Suleiman’s pattern of violating his terms of supervised release and engaging in aggressive conduct to his medication noncompliance. See United States v. Ecker, 30 F.3d 966, 970 (8th Cir. 1994) (listing suggested factors in determining potential dangerousness). We note that the Attorney General is under a continuing obligation to exert reasonable efforts to place Suleiman in a suitable state facility, and that his custodians must prepare annual reports concerning his mental condition and the need for continued commitment. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 4246(d) and 4247(e)(1)(B). The judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
