United States v. Dennis McLallen, No. 18-2048 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Loken, Gruender and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law. Anders case. Defendant's appeal waiver was valid, applicable and enforceable, and his challenge to his sentence is dismissed; the court would not consider issues of ineffective assistance of counsel in this direct appeal. [ April 11, 2019
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-2048 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Dennis McLallen lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________ Submitted: April 8, 2019 Filed: April 12, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Dennis McLallen directly appeals after he pleaded guilty to drug and firearm offenses, under a plea agreement containing an appeal waiver, and the district court1 1 The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. sentenced him below the calculated Guidelines range. In a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), his appellate counsel questions whether trial counsel was ineffective in not objecting to Guidelines enhancements, suggests that the district court imposed an unreasonable sentence, and seeks leave to withdraw. We decline to consider the ineffective-assistance issues raised in the Anders brief. See United States v. Ramirez-Hernandez, 449 F.3d 824, 827 (8th Cir. 2006) (discussing limited circumstances in which ineffective-assistance claims are considered on direct appeal). Construing the Anders brief as also challenging the application of Guidelines enhancements, as well as the reasonableness of the sentence, we conclude that the appeal waiver is valid, applicable, and enforceable. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review of validity and applicability of appeal waiver); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (discussing enforcement of appeal waivers). Having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal, and grant counsel leave to withdraw. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
