United States v. Eric Brown, No. 18-2020 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Colloton, Gruender and Erickson, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. Brown's three previous Illinois convictions for robbery, armed robbery and attempted armed robbery were crimes of violence for sentencing purposes under Guidelines Sec. 4B1.2(a)(1).
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-2020 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Eric Brown lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Ft. Dodge ____________ Submitted: April 15, 2019 Filed: July 19, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Eric Brown pleaded guilty to one count of possession of a firearm by a felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). The district court2 determined that 2 The Honorable Leonard T. Strand, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. Brown’s three previous Illinois convictions for robbery, armed robbery, and attempted armed robbery were crimes of violence and so applied a base offense level of 24 under United States Sentencing Guidelines § 2K2.1(a)(2). The district court then calculated Brown’s advisory guidelines range as 110 to 137 months’ imprisonment (capped at the 120-month statutory maximum), varied downward, and sentenced Brown to 96 months’ imprisonment. On appeal, Brown argues only that his Illinois convictions for robbery, armed robbery, and attempted armed robbery were not crimes of violence. “This court reviews de novo a district court’s determination that a conviction is a crime of violence under the Guidelines.” United States v. Rembert, 851 F.3d 836, 840 (8th Cir. 2017). We recently held that Illinois robbery is a crime of violence under the guidelines. United States v. Brown, 916 F.3d 706, 708 (8th Cir. 2019) (per curiam). Illinois armed robbery includes by reference all the elements of Illinois robbery, so Illinois armed robbery “requires at least as much force as simple robbery” and also qualifies as a crime of violence. Garcia-Hernandez v. United States, 915 F.3d 558, 561 (8th Cir. 2019);1 see also 720 ILL. Comp. Stat. 5/18-1(a) & 5/18-2(a). And if Illinois armed robbery is a crime of violence, so too is Illinois attempted armed robbery. See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(1), comment. (n.1) (noting that a crime of violence includes an attempt to commit such an offense). We affirm. ______________________________ 1 Garcia-Hernandez analyzed the relevant definition of a violent felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), and not the definition of a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(1). See Garcia-Hernandez, 915 F.3d at 561. But these definitions “are so similar that we generally consider cases interpreting them interchangeably.” Brown, 916 F.3d at 708. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
