United States v. Kessler, No. 18-1796 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseDefendant was found guilty by a jury of two drug crimes. The Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court's refusal to exclude testimony of a police detective regarding the value of the methamphetamine. The court assumed without deciding that the government's notice was deficient and held that defendant knew ahead of time that one of the expected topics of the detective's testimony would be the dollar values of the methamphetamine and defense counsel had the opportunity to question the detective beforehand. Finally, counsel never explained how the incomplete disclosure prejudiced his client or why only a more drastic remedy like exclusion would cure any harm.
Court Description: Stras, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Benton, Circuit Judge] Criminal case - Criminal law. Assuming the government's failure to provide defendant with advance notice of the value of the methamphetamine involved in the charge of possession with intent to distribute was a defect in the notice, the district court took steps at trial to remedy the matter, including requiring the government to disclose the value of the meth and providing a one-hour recess to permit defendant to prepare a response; further, defendant knew in advance that the value of the drug was among the expected topics of the witness's testimony and defendant had been given an opportunity to question the witness beforehand; in any event, defendant never explained to the district court how the incomplete disclosure prejudiced him or why only a more drastic remedy, like exclusion, was required.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.