United States v. Benton, No. 18-1016 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseThe Eighth Circuit affirmed defendant's sentence as a career offender after he pleaded guilty to one count of possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute. The court held that defendant's prior Louisiana drug conviction qualified as a predicate conviction for career offender sentencing under USSC 4B1.1(a). On this record, the court held that it was no more likely that defendant was convicted of simple possession of cocaine than it was he was convicted of possession with intent to distribute. The court also held that the district court's failure to inquire into the Louisiana conviction was clearly or obviously wrong in the absence of controlling precedent requiring district courts to sua sponte confirm the accuracy of the PSR's description of the defendant's prior convictions.
Court Description: Per Curiam - Before Gruender, Kelly and Grasz, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court did not plainly err in determining that defendant's Louisiana drug conviction qualified as a predicate conviction for career offender sentencing under Guidelines Sec. 4B1.1(a) as on this record it no more likely that he was convicted of simple possession of cocaine than it is he was convicted of possession with intent to distribute; in the absence of controlling precedent requiring district courts to sua sponte confirm the accuracy of the PSR's description of a prior conviction, the court cannot say that the district court's failure to inquire into the Louisiana conviction was clearly or obviously wrong.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.