United States v. Jackson, No. 16-3807 (8th Cir. 2017)
Annotate this CaseThe Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress evidence obtained during a search of his cell phone. The court held that defendant had no legitimate expectation of privacy in the cell phone, and the government had substantial interest in preventing recidivism that justified the intrusion. In this case, the search occurred while defendant was serving a term of supervised release and residing at the Fort Des Moines Community Correctional Facility.
Court Description: Colloton, Author, with Benton, Circuit Judge, and Gerrard, District Judge] Criminal case - Criminal law. Defendant, a parolee residing at a halfway house, did not have any legitimate expectation of privacy in his cell phone as he was aware that the halfway house's rules prohibited possession of a cellphone inside the residence and that any property possessed inside the residence was subject to search; the search was justified by the government's substantial interest in preventing recidivism and facilitating an offender's successful reentry into the community.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.