Elease Hill v. City of El Dorado, No. 16-2854 (8th Cir. 2017)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam. Before Gruender, Arnold, and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Civil Case - civil rights. Adverse grant of summary judgment is this civil rights action is summarily affirmed. [ May 15, 2017
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-2854 ___________________________ Elease Hill; Carlton Newsome; Vada Smith lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants v. City of El Dorado, an Incorporated Body through Mayor Frank Hass in his Official Capacity as Mayor and City Council in their Individual Official Capacity as the City Council of El Dorado lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - El Dorado ____________ Submitted: May 10, 2017 Filed: May 17, 2017 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Elease Hill, Carlton Newsome, and Vada Smith appeal the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Appellants have identified no valid basis for reversal of the rulings they challenge, and we find none.2 See Malone v. Hinman, 847 F.3d 949, 952 (8th Cir. 2017) (de novo review). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Susan O. Hickey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. 2 We have not considered arguments appellants raise for the first time on appeal. See Schaffer v. Beringer, 842 F.3d 585, 592 n.2 (8th Cir. 2016), petition for cert. filed, U.S. Feb. 17, 2017 (No. 16-1262). -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
