Jamie Jackson v. Carolyn W. Colvin, No. 16-1804 (8th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Smith, Bowman and Benton, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Social Security. Decision denying benefits was supported by substantial evidence and is affirmed without comment. [ December 06, 2016
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-1804 ___________________________ Jamie Lee Jackson lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock ____________ Submitted: December 2, 2016 Filed: December 7, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Jamie Lee Jackson appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the Commissioner’s determination that she is not entitled to disability insurance benefits, after her hearing before an administrative law judge. Upon de novo review, see Perks v. Astrue, 687 F.3d 1086, 1091, 1093 (8th Cir. 2012), we are satisfied that the decision is supported by substantial evidence on the whole record. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
