Robert Clayborne, Jr. v. Christopher Eickholt, No. 16-1615 (8th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam. Before Colloton, Bowman, and Gruender, Circuit Judges] Civil Case - civil rights. Dismissal of complaint asserting deliberate indifference and disability discrimination is summarily affirmed. [ August 02, 2016
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-1615 ___________________________ Robert Earl Clayborne, Jr., lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Lancanster County; Lancaster County Jail Director, individually and in their official capacity jointly and severally; Lancaster County Medical Director, individually and in their official capacity jointly and severally; Lancaster County Correct Care Solutions Medical Department; Mary Howell, Lancaster County Correct Care Solutions Mental Health Practitioner, individually and in their official capacity jointly, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants, Christopher Eickholt, Lancaster County Public Defender/Court Official, individually and in their official capacity jointly and severally; Lori Pasold, Lancaster County Attorney, individually and in their official capacity jointly and severally; Stephanie Stacy, Lancaster County District Court Judge, individually and in their official capacity jointly and severally, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees, Patrick F. Condon, Lancaster County Chief Deputy County Attorney, individually and in their official capacity jointly and severally; State of Nebraska, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants. ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha ____________ Submitted: July 22, 2016 Filed: August 3, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Robert Clayborne, Jr. appeals the district court’s1 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) dismissal of his pro se complaint asserting a claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and a claim of disability discrimination, under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Upon careful de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we conclude that the dismissal was proper. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
