Calvin Hammock v. NASA Headquarters, No. 16-1301 (8th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Loken, Bowman and Murphy, Circuit Judges] Civil case. Dismissal for failure to state a claim affirmed without comment. [ October 03, 2016
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-1301 ___________________________ Calvin Hammock lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. NASA Headquarters; Department of Defense; Space Exploration Technologies Space X; Apple; Blackberry (Curve) Corporation; Virgin Mobile; Mediacom WiFi; American Water Iowa; Unknown Defendants lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport ____________ Submitted: October 3, 2016 Filed: October 4, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Calvin Hammock appeals after the district court1 dismissed his pro se complaint. Upon careful review, we find no reason to reverse the dismissal order because, among other reasons, we agree with the district court that Hammock failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009); Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007); Kelly v. City of Omaha, 813 F.3d 1070, 1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo review). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
