Stephen Bloomer v. Joe Caffrey, No. 16-1063 (8th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Loken, Benton and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil rights. Defendants' summary judgment affirmed without comment. [ August 19, 2016
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-1063 ___________________________ Stephen Bloomer; Karla Harksen lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants v. Joe Caffrey, Scott County Deputy Sheriff; Scott County Iowa; Unknown Defendants lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees Henry W. Latham, II lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport ____________ Submitted: August 17, 2016 Filed: August 22, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Stephen Bloomer and his mother, Karla Harksen, appeal the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms. This court reviewed the record de novo and carefully considered the arguments for reversal. Summary judgment was proper. See Torgerson v. City of Rochester, 643 F.3d 1031, 1042 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (de novo standard of review; summary judgment is appropriate if record, viewing facts and inferences in light most favorable to nonmoving party, shows there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and moving party is entitled to judgment as matter of law). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
