Haggenmiller v. ABM Parking Serv., No. 15-3107 (8th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseAfter plaintiff was terminated from her job at ABM, she filed suit against her former employer, alleging that she was unlawfully terminated based on age in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn. Stat. 363A.08. The court concluded that, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the district court did not err in granting summary judgment to ABM. In this case, plaintiff did not meet her burden of establishing a genuine issue of material fact that ABM’s proffered legitimate reason for her termination was pretext for age discrimination.
Court Description: Riley, Author, with Colloton and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Employment discrimination. Defendant offered legitimate, non-discriminatory grounds for its decision to terminate plaintiff, and she failed to show these grounds were pretexts for age discrimination. [ September 13, 2016
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.