Arnetta Swift v. Schmaderer, No. 15-1680 (8th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Shepherd, Bye and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil Rights. Dismissal affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-1680 ___________________________ Arnetta Swift, Nee Hill born Arnetta Hill lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Schmaderer, Chief Omaha Police; John Decohort, Unknown of Omaha Police Officers; Kyler, Omaha Police Officer; John Doe, Unknown, Cohort of Omaha Police lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha ____________ Submitted: August 20, 2015 Filed: August 24, 2015 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SHEPHERD, BYE, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Arnetta Swift appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissal of her pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, for failure to state a claim. She also moves for appointment of counsel on appeal. After careful de novo review, we conclude that Swift’s complaint was properly dismissed. See Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (preservice dismissal is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. The motion for appointment of counsel is denied. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable John M. Gerrard, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
