Michael Bowden v. Jimmy Banks, No. 14-3844 (8th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Per Curiam - Before Smith, Bowman and Colloton, Circuit Judges] Prisoner case - Prisoner Civil Rights. Order dismissing some defendants and granting summary judgment to the remaining defendants affirmed without comment. [ June 22, 2015

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 14-3844 ___________________________ Michael Bowden lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Jimmy Banks, Warden, Varner Unit, ADC; Joe Page, III, Deputy Warden, Varner Unit, ADC; Shirley Hudson, CO, Varner Unit, ADC; G. Williams, CO, Varner Unit, ADC; K. Bolden, Major, Varner Unit, ADC lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff ____________ Submitted: June 15, 2015 Filed: June 23, 2015 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Michael Bowden appeals following entry of judgment against him in his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, in which he claimed that defendants failed to protect him from an assault by other inmates. Upon careful de novo review, we conclude that, for the reasons explained by the district court,1 the court not err in (1) dismissing three defendants without prejudice based on Bowden’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies, see 42 U.S.C. § 1997(e); King v. Iowa Dep’t of Corr., 598 F.3d 1051, 10532 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review); and (2) granting summary judgment for the remaining two defendants, see Whitson v. Stone Cnty. Jail, 602 F.3d 920, 923 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review and elements of failure-to-protect case). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Joe J. Volpe, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.