Phillips, et al. v. Phillips, No. 13-6019 (8th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed from orders of the bankruptcy court awarding judgments against him for intentional conversion of property, for costs of suit, and determining that the judgments were not discharged under 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(6). The bankruptcy appellate panel concluded that the bankruptcy court did not err in granting preclusive effect to the Minnesota state court's order regarding ownership of the assets at issue and defendant did not raise any other assignments of error. Accordingly, the panel affirmed the decision of the bankruptcy panel.
Court Description: Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Bankruptcy court did not err in granting preclusive effect to the Minnesota state court's order regarding ownership of the assets at issue. [ October 29, 2013
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.