United States v. Roberts, No. 13-3275 (8th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his sentence after being convicted of two counts of bank robbery. The district court sentenced defendant to life imprisonment because he previously had been convicted of two serious violent felonies. The court concluded that defendant's argument, that Alleyne v. United States and the Sixth Amendment require that a jury must find the fact of his prior convictions because it increased the maximum penalty to which he was exposed, was foreclosed by precedent. Further, defendant's argument, that the affirmative defense of 18 U.S.C. 3559(c)(3), and its placement of a burden of persuasion on defendant to show that a prior bank robbery conviction is nonqualifying, contravenes the Fifth and Sixth Amendments, was also foreclosed by precedent. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment of the district court.
Court Description: Criminal case - Sentencing. Almendarez-Torres v. U.S., 523 U.S. 224 (1998) forecloses defendant's argument that a jury must find the fact of his prior convictions, and Alleyne did not revisit Almendarez-Torres' conclusion that recidivism is not an element of the offense that must be submitted to a jury; defendant's claim that his affirmative duty to establish the affirmative defense set out in 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3559(c)(3) violates his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights is foreclosed by this court's precedents.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.