United States v. Angel Solano-Fierro, No. 13-1470 (8th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Criminal case - Sentencing. District court did not err in imposing a two-level enhancement under Guidelines Sec. 2D1.1(b)(1) for possession of a firearm in connection with the underlying drug offenses.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-1470 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Angel Ivan Solano-Fierro lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Sioux City ____________ Submitted: October 21, 2013 Filed: October 29, 2013 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Angel Solano-Fierro appeals the 292-month sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine in 1 1 The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846 and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Solano-Fierro contends that the district court erroneously increased his sentencing offense level by two points for possessing a firearm while committing the aforementioned offenses. At sentencing, the district court heard evidence from testifying co-defendants that Solano-Fierro had a handgun in his jacket during a methamphetamine deal, that he possessed the handgun for protection and security, and that while he conducted deals from his home, he kept the gun in sight on the table. Further, officers seized a handgun from his home. In light of this record evidence, the government proved that the gun was connected to the offense within the meaning of United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1(b)(1), and the district court did not clearly err in finding that the twolevel increase was warranted. United States v. Garcia, 703 F.3d 471, 475-77 (8th Cir. 2013) (noting the standard of review and holding that it was not clearly improbable that the weapon was connected to the drug offense when guns were located in the home where drug deals took place). Accordingly, we affirm. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
