Robbins, et al v. Becker, Sr., et al, No. 12-3113 (8th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseThis interlocutory appeal arose out of the district court's denial of summary judgment on defendants' qualified immunity defenses to plaintiffs' 42 U.S.C. 1983 and Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 1-2, claims. The court declined to address the merits of defendants' qualified immunity defense because the district court's analysis denying summary judgment was so scant that the court was unable to discern if the district court even applied both steps of the qualified immunity inquiry to all of the summary judgment claims. Accordingly, the court remanded to the district court for further proceedings.
Court Description: Civil case - Civil rights. The district court's analysis denying defendants' motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity is so scant that the court cannot affirm or reverse the order, and the matter is remanded for a more detailed consideration and explanation.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.