William Irving v. Larry Crawford, No. 12-2034 (8th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - Civil rights. District court judgment affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 12-2034 ___________________________ William E. Irving lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Larry Crawford, D.O.C. Director, Individually and Officially; Troy Steele, Superintendent, SECC, Individually and Officially; Cheryl Dowdy, Functional Unit Manager, SECC, Individually and Officially; Daniel Martinez, Functional Unit Manager, SECC, Individually and Officially; Greg Walker, Correctional Officer, Sergeant, SECC, Individually; Charles Mitchell, Correctional Officer, Sergeant, SECC, Individually; Cynthia Reese, Chief of Mental Health, SECC, Individually; Debbie Vinson, Director of Nursing, CMS, Individually; Penny Lynn, Correctional Officer, Sergeant, SECC, Individually; Gina Cook, Investigator, SECC, Individually and Officially; Dr. Michael Hakala; Melissa Crumley, Nurse lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - Cape Girardeau ____________ Submitted: December 17, 2012 Filed: December 20, 2012 [Unpublished] ____________ Before BYE, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Inmate William E. Irving appeals the district court s1 orders dismissing certain claims in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) or Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and granting summary judgment on the remaining claims. Upon careful consideration of Irving s arguments and review of the relevant record, we find no basis for reversal. The district court is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny Irving s pending motion requesting court action to gain adequate access to law library materials. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
