Albert Richardson v. T. Outlaw, No. 11-1512 (8th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Prisoner case - habeas. Denial of Section 2241 petition affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 11-1512 ___________ Albert A. Richardson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. T.C. Outlaw, Warden, FCI-Forrest City, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: September 2, 2011 Filed: September 7, 2011 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Albert Richardson appeals the district court s1 denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We deny his motion for appointment of counsel, and we conclude that habeas relief was not warranted for the reasons relied upon by the district court, see Hill v. Morrison, 349 F.3d 1089, 1091 (8th Cir. 2003) (standard of review). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable J. Thomas Ray, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
