United States v. Brandon Coffman, No. 11-1011 (8th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Criminal case - Sentencing. Appeal from a Rule 35(b) reduction does not meet the criteria of 18 U.S.C. sec. 3742(a), and the appeal is dismissed.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 11-1011 ___________ United States of America, Appellee, v. Brandon Gerome Coffman, Appellant. * * * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. * * [UNPUBLISHED] * * ___________ Submitted: May 11, 2011 Filed: May 27, 2011 ___________ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. After the district court1 granted the government s Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) motion and reduced the 235-month prison sentence of Brandon Coffman to 114 months, he filed this appeal arguing that the court should have granted a greater reduction. Upon careful review, we conclude that this appeal does not meet the criteria of 18 U.S.C. ยง 3742(a). See United States v. Haskins, 479 F.3d 955, 957 (8th Cir. 2007) (per curiam). Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we dismiss the appeal. ______________________ 1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
