United States v. Carter, No. 10-2777 (8th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CaseDefendant pleaded guilty to one count of unlawful possession of a firearm as a previously convicted felon and was sentenced to 105 months imprisonment followed by three years of supervised release. Defendant appealed the district court's application of the advisory sentencing guidelines and its imposition of a special condition of supervised release. The court held that the district court did not fail to consider U.S.S.G. 5G1.3(b)(1) in its guidelines calculations or in fashioning its ultimate sentence, it simply determined that, in light of all the 18 U.S.C. 3553(a) factors, a variance from the guidelines was appropriate. The court also held that defendant was statutorily barred from working at a federal credit union or FDIC-insured institution pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 1785 and 1829. Therefore, as the district court merely incorporated a statutory prohibition and ordered defendant to comply with federal law, there was no abuse of discretion.
Court Description: Criminal case - Sentencing. District court properly considered Guidelines Sec. 5G1.3(b)(1) in its guidelines calculations and reached its chosen sentence only after determining that a guidelines sentence was inappropriate; no error in imposing a special condition in defendant's supervised release restricting his ability to work at certain financial institutions as defendant was statutorily barred from such employment. Judge Bye, dissenting.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.