United States v. Isaac Pike, No. 10-2394 (8th Cir. 2010)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Criminal case - Criminal law. Denial of Rule 41(c) motion for the return of property affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 10-2394 ___________ United States of America, Appellee, v. Isaac Pike, Appellant. * * * * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. * * [UNPUBLISHED] * ___________ Submitted: November 30, 2010 Filed: December 6, 2010 ___________ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Isaac Pike appeals the district court s1 denial of his Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(e)2 motions for the return of property. Upon reviewing the district 1 The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 2 In 2002, Rule 41 was reorganized, and the substance of former subsection (e) was incorporated into subsection (g). See Fed. R. Crim. P. 41 advisory committee s notes (2002 amends.) (language of Rule 41 was amended as part of general restyling of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure; except as otherwise noted, changes were intended to be stylistic only). court s legal conclusions de novo and its findings of fact for clear error, see Jackson v. United States, 526 F.3d 394, 396 (8th Cir. 2008), we conclude that the district court properly denied Pike s motions for the reasons it stated. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
