Pete Wright v. State of Missouri, et al, No. 10-1217 (8th Cir. 2010)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Prisoner case - prisoner civil rights. Dismissal and summary judgment orders affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 10-1217 ___________ Pete Wright, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Appellee, George Lombardi; Larry Crawford, Defendants, Arthur Wood; Dave Dormire; Jay Cassady, Appellees, Gary Rice, Defendant, Deborah Hardin-Vinson; Oscar Johnson; Stanley Chris Swicord; Alfred Garcia; Dr. Rex Hardman, Missouri Department of Corrections, Appellees. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. [UNPUBLISHED] ___________ Submitted: September 7, 2010 Filed: September 16, 2010 ___________ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Missouri inmate Pete Wright appeals the district court s1 partial dismissal and partial adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se action alleging federal civil rights and state law tort claims. Following careful de novo review, we find that dismissal and summary judgment were appropriate for the reasons discussed in the district court s orders. See Wojewski v. Rapid City Reg l Hosp., 450 F.3d 338, 342 (8th Cir. 2006) (de novo review of order granting summary judgment); Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (de novo review of dismissal under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Wright s pending motion. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
