United States v. Thomas Freeman, No. 10-1163 (8th Cir. 2010)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Criminal case - sentencing. Sentence imposed upon revocation of defendant's supervised release was not unreasonable.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 10-1163 ___________ United States of America, Appellee, v. Thomas George Freeman, Appellant. * * * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. * * [UNPUBLISHED] * * ___________ Submitted: April 13, 2010 Filed: April 16, 2010 ___________ Before LOKEN, BYE, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. In this direct criminal appeal, Thomas Freeman challenges the sentence the district court1 imposed after revoking his supervised release. Upon careful review, we conclude that the revocation sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Tyson, 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (revocation sentences are reviewed for unreasonableness in accordance with United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 1 The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. 220 (2005)). Accordingly, we affirm the district court s judgment, and we grant counsel s motion to withdraw. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
