Stanley Hart, III v. John Baldwin, et al, No. 09-3639 (8th Cir. 2010)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Prisoner case - prisoner civil rights. Dismissal affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 09-3639 ___________ Stanley L. Hart, III, Appellant, v. John Baldwin, individually and in his official capacity; Kristine Weitzel, individually and in her official capacity; Cornell Smith, individually and in his official capacity; Darlene Baugh, individually and in her official capacity; Mary Dick, individually and in her official capacity; Dustin Lutgen, individually and in his official capacity; Deborah Edwards, individually and in her official capacity; Betty Brown, individually and in her official capacity; George Mister, individually and in his official capacity; Tom Conley, individually and in his official capacity; Kelly Holder, individually and in her official capacity; Tony Comp, individually and in his official capacity; Netti Renshaw, individually and in her official capacity; Marilyn Sharar, individually and in her official capacity; Doug Thompson, individually and in his official capacity, Appellees. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. [UNPUBLISHED] ___________ Submitted: April 22, 2010 Filed: April 23, 2010 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Iowa inmate Stanley Hart appeals the district court s1 order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. We conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (exhaustion of administrative remedies). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
