Rhonda Thompson, et al v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty, No. 09-2925 (8th Cir. 2010)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - Attorneys' fees. District court order denying plaintiffs' motion to award statutory penalty, attorneys' fees and prejudgment interest affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 09-2925 ___________ Rhonda Thompson; Keith Thompson, Appellants, v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, Appellee. * * * * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. * * [UNPUBLISHED] * * ___________ Submitted: March 22, 2010 Filed: March 25, 2010 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. In this appeal after remand, Rhonda and Keith Thompson challenge the district court s1 denial of their motion to award a statutory penalty, attorney fees, and prejudgment interest against their insurer, Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company. After careful review, we find no basis for reversal. See All-Ways Logistics, Inc. v. USA Truck, Inc., 583 F.3d 511, 518 (8th Cir. 2009) (district court s denial of prejudgment interest reviewed for abuse of discretion); Dupps v. Travelers 1 The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Ins. Co., 80 F.3d 312, 313 (8th Cir. 1996) (de novo review of district court s application of state law); Running M Farms, Inc. v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 265 S.W.3d 740, 745 (Ark. 2007); State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. v. Thomas, 871 S.W.2d 571, 573 (Ark. 1994). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
