Rudolph Stanko, etc. v. Ricardo Rios, etc., et al, No. 09-2338 (8th Cir. 2010)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Prisoner case - habeas. Dismissal of Section 2241 petition affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 09-2338 ___________ Rudolph George Stanko, and on behalf of prisoners imprisoned with the Federal Bureau of Prisons, * * * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Ricardo Rios, local director/warden; * Michael K. Nelley, regional director; * [UNPUBLISHED] Harley Lappin, national director, * * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: February 24, 2010 Filed: February 26, 2010 ___________ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Rudolph George Stanko appeals the district court s1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 petition. Having reviewed the record de novo, see Lopez- 1 The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Jeanne J. Graham, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. Lopez v. Sanders, 590 F.3d 905, 907 (8th Cir. 2010), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
