Douglas Coleman v. Duluth Police Department, et al, No. 09-2002 (8th Cir. 2010)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - civil rights. Defendants' judgment affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 09-2002 ___________ Douglas Hiram Coleman, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Duluth Police Department, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Defendant, * District of Minnesota. * Chief Gordon Ramsay; Officer Tinsley, * [UNPUBLISHED] and other unidentified Duluth Police * Officers, both individually and in * their official capacity; Ford Du Luth * Casino-Security; Unidentified Security * Officers, both individually and in their * official capacity; Jim Urness, Manager/ * Chief of Security, both individually and * in his official capacity, * * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: April 7, 2010 Filed: April 12, 2010 ___________ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Douglas Coleman appeals the district court s1 adverse grant of motions to dismiss and for summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 action. Following careful de novo review of the record, we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Coleman s pending motion. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Raymond L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
