Homer Mooney v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan #1, No. 09-1929 (8th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Civil case - ERISA. Plan did not abuse its discretion by denying plaintiff's claim for long-term disability benefits, and the district court's order affirming the plan's decision is affirmed without comment.

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 09-1929 ___________ Homer Mooney, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan #1, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: March 5, 2010 Filed: March 15, 2010 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges ___________ PER CURIAM. Homer Mooney appeals the district court s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his Employment Retirement Income Security Act lawsuit against AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan #1 (the Plan) arising from the denial of long-term-disability (LTD) benefits. Upon de novo review of the record, we agree with the district court that the Plan did not abuse its discretion in denying Mooney s claim for LTD disability benefits. See Dillard s Inc. v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of Boston, 456 F.3d 894, 1 The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 899 (8th Cir. 2006) (plan administrator s decision will be reversed only if it was arbitrary and capricious; decision need be only reasonable, meaning it must be supported by substantial evidence); see also Norris v. Citibank, N.A. Disability Plan (501), 308 F.3d 880, 883-84 (8th Cir. 2002) (reviewing de novo district court s application of abuse-of-discretion standard). Accordingly, we affirm, and we reject as meritless Mooney s arguments for reversal. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.