Lisa Barnes-McNeely v. AR Department of Health, et al, No. 09-1824 (8th Cir. 2010)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case. Dismissal affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 09-1824 ___________ Lisa Barnes-McNeely, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Arkansas Department of Health and * Eastern District of Arkansas. Human Services, Pine Bluff Division; * Gwen Williams, Mrs., Agency * [UNPUBLISHED] Supervisor/Coordinator in her official * and individual capacity; Rosemary * Caudle, in her official and individual * capacity (Supervisor); Minnie Berry, * Mrs., Agency Supervisor in her official * and individual capacity; Beverly Harris, * Mrs., official and individual capacity * (Fraud Investigator); Department of * Health and Human Services, Director, * Kathleen Sebelius,1 Washington, DC; * Department of Agriculture, * 2 * Thomas J. Vilsack, * Appellees. * ___________ 1 Kathleen Sebelius has been appointed to serve as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, and is substituted as respondent pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c). 2 Thomas J. Vilsack has been appointed to serve as Secretary of the Department of Agriculture, and is substituted as respondent pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c). Submitted: February 10, 2010 Filed: February 23, 2010 ___________ Before BYE, RILEY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Lisa Barnes-McNeely appeals the district court s3 dismissal of her civil action, and has filed motions to strike appellees briefs and for a default judgment. Upon careful de novo review, see Schaaf v. Residential Funding Corp., 517 F.3d 544, 549 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 129 S. Ct. 222 (2008), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. In addition, Barnes s pending motions are denied. ______________________________ 3 The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
