United States v. Carlton Bass, No. 08-2881 (8th Cir. 2009)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Criminal Case - Rule 36. District court did not err in denying Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36 motion, as error was not a clerical error.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 08-2881 ___________ United States of America, Appellee, v. Carlton Bass, Appellant. * * * * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. * * [UNPUBLISHED] * ___________ Submitted: October 6, 2009 Filed: October 7, 2009 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Carlton Bass appeals the district court s1 denial of his Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36 motion to correct a clerical error in the October 1998 judgment in his criminal case. We agree with the district court that the type of error Bass alleged was not a clerical error, see United States v. Yakle, 463 F.3d 810, 811 (8th Cir. 2006) (per curiam), and we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
