City of Kansas City, et al v. Warren Watkins, No. 08-2738 (8th Cir. 2010)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case. Notice of appeal defendant purported to file on behalf of an artificial entity was ineffective and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 08-2738 ___________ City of Kansas City, Missouri, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. Housing & Economic Development * Financial Corporation, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee, * * David Bahner, * * Appellee, * * ------------------------------------------* * Warren Watkins, * * Appellant. * ___________ Submitted: February 22, 2010 Filed: February 25, 2010 ___________ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Appearing pro se, Warren Watkins appeals from the district court s1 orders denying pleadings that he filed on behalf of Monarch Community Improvement Council (Monarch). As a preliminary matter, we have an independent obligation to consider our own jurisdiction. See Thomas v. Basham, 931 F.2d 521, 522-23 (8th Cir. 1991). We conclude that the pleadings Watkins filed were not properly before the district court, see Rowland v. Cal. Men s Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 202-03 (1993) (artificial entities may appear in federal courts only through licensed attorneys); the notice of appeal, which Watkins purported to file pro se on Monarch s behalf, was ineffective to perfect this appeal, see United States v. Van Stelton, 988 F.2d 70, 70 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (corporation that was not represented by counsel was not party to appeal; corporation cannot appear pro se); and Watkins lacks standing to present arguments on his own behalf on appeal, see United States v. Northshore Mining Co., 576 F.3d 840, 847 (8th Cir. 2009) (examining whether party was aggrieved by district court s order, such that appellate court had jurisdiction over appeal); City of Clarkson Valley v. Mineta, 495 F.3d 567, 569 (8th Cir. 2007) (standing is jurisdictional prerequisite that must be resolved before reaching merits of suit). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
