Pamela Hoskins-Harris v. Tyco/Mallinckrodt Healthcare, et al, No. 08-2194 (8th Cir. 2009)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - employment discrimination. Defendants' summary judgment affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 08-2194 ___________ Pamela Hoskins-Harris, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Tyco/Mallinckrodt Healthcare; * United Auto Workers, Local 1887, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: October 15, 2009 Filed: October 20, 2009 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Pamela Hoskins-Harris (Hoskins-Harris) appeals the district court s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment discrimination action. After reviewing the record de novo, viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences from it in the light most favorable to Hoskins-Harris, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review), we conclude summary judgment was 1 The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Thus, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
