United States v. Rashaund Jackson, No. 08-2018 (8th Cir. 2009)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Criminal Case- revocation of supervised release. Sentence imposed after revocation of supervised release is not unreasonable.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 08-2018 ___________ United States of America, Appellee, v. Rashaund L. Jackson, Appellant. * * * * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. * * [UNPUBLISHED] * ___________ Submitted: April 23, 2009 Filed: May 4, 2009 ___________ Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Rashaund Jackson appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after revoking his supervised release. Upon reviewing the record and counsel s brief, we conclude Jackson s sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Tyson, 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (standard of review). The sentence is within the statutory limits of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3), and the sentence resulted from the district court s consideration of appropriate factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See United States v. Nelson, 453 F.3d 1004, 1006 (8th Cir. 2006) (explaining an 1 The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. appellate court reviews a revocation sentence to determine whether the sentence is unreasonable in relation to, inter alia, the advisory Guidelines range and the § 3553(a) factors). We affirm. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
