William Jones v. Merit Systems Protection Bd., No. 08-1979 (8th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Civil case. Dismissal affirmed without comment.

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 08-1979 ___________ William D. Jones, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: May 6, 2009 Filed: May 11, 2009 ___________ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. After the district court1 dismissed William Jones s complaint against the United States Merit Systems Protection Board for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, he brought this appeal. We agree with the district court that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction for the reasons explained in the court s thorough memorandum opinion and order, and we conclude that in these circumstances, the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to transfer the action to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. See LeMay v. U.S. Postal Serv., 450 F.3d 797, 799 (8th Cir. 1 The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. 2006) (dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction reviewed de novo); United States v. Hull, 419 F.3d 762, 768 (8th Cir. 2005) (refusal to transfer reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.