David Jeep v. Jack Bennett, et al, No. 08-1823 (8th Cir. 2008)

 Annotate this Case

Court Description: Civil case - Civil rights. Orders dismissing some of plaintiff's claims and granting summary judgment on the claims against the remaining defendants are affirmed without comment.

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 08-1823 ___________ David G. Jeep, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Jack A. Bennett, Associate Circuit * Judge, Camden County; Devin M. * Appeal from the United States Ledom, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, * District Court for the Camden County; Alex Little, Police * Western District of Missouri. Officer, #920, City of Osage Beach; * Tim Taylor, Police Officer, #913, City * of Osage Beach; W. Steven Rives, * [UNPUBLISHED] Prosecuting Attorney; W. James * Icenogle, Prosecuting Attorney; Bruce * Colyer, Associate Circuit Judge; Jay * Nixon, Attorney General, State of * Missouri; Camden County; City of * Osage Beach; State of Missouri, * * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: October 6, 2008 Filed: October 10, 2008 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. David Jeep appeals the district court s1 orders dismissing his claims against multiple defendants and granting summary judgment to the remaining defendants in his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 action. After careful review, we conclude that the orders were proper for the reasons stated by the district court and that an extended discussion is not warranted. See Maness v. Dist. Court, 495 F.3d 943, 943-44 (8th Cir. 2007) (per curiam) (de novo review of dismissals based on immunity); Rouse v. Benson, 193 F.3d 936, 939 (8th Cir. 1999) (district court s grant of summary judgment reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny as moot Jeep s motion for an expedited appeal. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.