Donald Winnett v. Saline County Jail, et al, No. 08-1690 (8th Cir. 2009)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Prisoner case - prisoner civil rights. District court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 08-1690 ___________ Donald Felix Winnett, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Saline County Jail; Hugh Gentry, Lt., * Saline County Jail, originally sued as * Appeal from the United States Huge Gentry; Dru Reed, Sgt., Saline * District Court for the County Jail, originally sued only as * Eastern District of Arkansas. Reed; Ray Pennington, Sgt., Saline * County Jail, originally sued only as * [UNPUBLISHED] Pennington; Chad Westbrook, Jailer, * Saline County Jail, originally sued only * as Westbrook; Brandon Ford, Jailer, * Saline County Jail originally sued only * as Ford; Dan Sutterfield, Detective, * Arresting Officer; John Doe, Arresting * Officer, * * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: March 6, 2009 Filed: March 6, 2009 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. In this interlocutory appeal, Arkansas inmate Donald Winnett contests the district court s1 denial without prejudice of his motion for appointment of counsel in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit. We find no abuse of discretion. See Phillips v. Jasper County Jail, 437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review; there is no statutory or constitutional right to appointed counsel in civil case). The district court s order reflects consideration of appropriate factors such as the factual complexity of the issues, Winnett s ability to investigate the facts and present his claims, and the complexity of the legal arguments. See Nelson v. Shuffman, 476 F.3d 635, 636 (8th Cir. 2007) (per curiam); Phillips, 437 F.3d at 794. Moreover, the denial was without prejudice, so the court may revisit the decision at a later time if appropriate. We reject Winnett s suggestion of judicial bias. See United States v. Dehghani, 550 F.3d 716, 721 (8th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny Winnett s motion on appeal for appointment of counsel. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
