Allison Chapman v. U.S. Bank, N.A., etc., No. 08-1611 (8th Cir. 2009)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - civil procedure. District court's denial of a motion for reconsideration affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 08-1611 ___________ Allison Chapman, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the U.S. Bank, N.A., a Minnesota * District of Minnesota. Corporation, formerly known as * Heritage Bank Inc., former Montana * [UNPUBLISHED] Corporation, * * Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: May 6, 2009 Filed: May 8, 2009 ___________ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Allison Chapman appeals the district court s1 denial of her motion for reconsideration. We hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration, because Chapman raised arguments that she could have raised in a timely appeal. See Sanders v. Clemco Indus., 862 F.2d 161, 169-70 (8th Cir. 1988) 1 The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. (standard of review; court was not required to grant Rule 60(b) motion where it raised ground for relief that could have been raised in timely appeal). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
