Frederick Pitchford v. City of Earle, Arkansas, et al, No. 07-3747 (8th Cir. 2009)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - civil rights. Defendants' summary judgment affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-3747 ___________ Frederick L. Pitchford, * * Appellant, * * v. * * City of Earle, Arkansas; Sherman * Smith, Individually and in official * capacity as Mayor of Earle, Arkansas; * Sylvia Layton, Individually and in * official capacity as Clerk of the City of * Earle, Arkansas; Robert Malone, * Individually and in official capacity as * member of Earle City Council; Sara * Johnson, Individually and in official * capacity as member of Earle City * Council; Ann Pickering, Individually * and in official capacity as member of * Earle City Council; Jesse Selvy, * Individually and in official capacity as * member of Earle City Council; Bobby * Luckett, Individually and in official * capacity as member of Earle City * Council; Donnie Cheers, Individually * and in official capacity as member of * Earle City Council; Leroy Bowling, * Individually and in official capacity as * member of Earle City Council; L. * Manual Clouse, City Inspector, Earle, * Arkansas, * * Appellees. * Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. [UNPUBLISHED] ___________ Submitted: April 3, 2009 Filed: April 8, 2009 ___________ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Frederick Pitchford appeals the district court s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his civil-rights action against the City of Earle, Arkansas, and some of its officials. After careful review, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
