Rosie Hopkins v. State of Arkansas, et al, No. 07-3473 (8th Cir. 2009)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - employment discrimination. Defendant's summary judgment affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-3473 ___________ Rosie Hopkins, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the State of Arkansas; Arkansas * Eastern District of Arkansas. Department of Community Correction; * David Guntharp, in his official * [UNPUBLISHED] capacity, * * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: July 27, 2009 Filed: August 3, 2009 ___________ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Rosie Hopkins appeals the district court s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment-discrimination action. After reviewing the record de novo, viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences from it in a light most favorable to Hopkins, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard 1 The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. of review), we conclude summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Hopkins s motion to supplement the record on appeal is denied. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
