Chrystal Gray v. AR Dept. of Human Services, et al, No. 07-2177 (8th Cir. 2008)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - employment discrimination. Defendant's summary judgment affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-2177 ___________ Chrystal Gray, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Arkansas Department of Human * Services, An Agency for the State of * [UNPUBLISHED] Arkansas; Selena Ellis, Individually * and in her official capacity as Program * Manager for the Division of * Volunteerism; Sherry Anderson, * Individually and in her official capacity * as Director of the Division of * Volunteerism; John Selig, * * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: July 25, 2008 Filed: August 5, 2008 ___________ Before MURPHY, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Chrystal Gray appeals the district court s1 adverse grant of summary judgment on her employment-discrimination and retaliation claims brought under Title VII and 42 U.S.C. ยงยง 1981, 1983. After reviewing the record de novo, viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences from it in a light most favorable to Gray, see Kincaid v. City of Omaha, 378 F.3d 799, 803-04 (8th Cir. 2004) (de novo standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable George Howard, Jr., late a United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
