Gary Snyder v. Janice Snyder, et al, No. 07-1973 (8th Cir. 2008)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - civil rights. Defendants' judgment affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-1973 ___________ Gary L. Snyder, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Janice Snyder, Individually and * Personally; Arapahoe County Sheriff s * Office, Multiple John and Jane Doe * Sheriff Deputies, (Each Individually * and Personally); Arapahoe County * Social Services, Colorado; Jefferson * County Social Services, Colorado; * Kathleen Curley, (Individually and * Personally); Ingrid Holmes, * (Individually and Personally); Mardi * A. Ewing, (Individually and * Personally); Linda Froehler, * (Individually and Personally); Linda * Gibson-Hendrick, (Individually and * Personally); Charles D. Moon, * (Individually and Personally); Katie * Smith, (Individually and * Personally); Stephanie Simpson, * (Individually and Personally); Eileen * Wiseman, (Individually and * Personally); John Doe Process * Service Company, Colorado * (Individually and Personally and in its * Business Capacity); Orbitz Couriers; * Douglas County Sheriff s Office, * Multiple John and Jane Doe Sheriff * Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. [UNPUBLISHED] Deputies, (Each Individually and Personally); Jennifer Gening, RN (Individually and Personally); Douglas County, Minnesota, (In Its Governmental Capacity); Jeffry Rustand, (Individually and Personally); Sherburne County Social Services, Minnesota; Mary Patton, (Individually and Personally); Jeffrey Scott Snyder, (Individually and Personally; For Jurisdiction Only); Barry Brooks Snyder, (Individually and Personally; For Jurisdiction Only); Kevin Grant Snyder, (Individually and Personally; For Jurisdiction Only), Appellees. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ___________ Submitted: November 25, 2008 Filed: December 2, 2008 ___________ Before MURPHY, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Gary Snyder appeals the district court s1 adverse judgment disposing of his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 action. After careful review, we have found no basis for reversal and therefore affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 1 The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
