Desert Orchid Partners, et al v. Transaction Systems Architects, et al, No. 07-1720 (8th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Civil case - Securities. District court order approving a settlement in this securities class action lawsuit is affirmed without comment.

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-1720 ___________ Genesee County Employees Retirement System; Desert Orchid Partners, L.L.C., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellees, v. Dwight G. Hanson; Transaction Systems Architects, Inc.; William E. Fischer; Gregory J. Duman; Edward Fuxa; David C. Russell, Appellees, v. James H. Sykora; Thomas G. Foley, Interested parties, James J. Hayes, Appellant, Alan Young; Karen Young, Interested parties, Nancy Rosen, On Behalf of * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. [UNPUBLISHED] Herself and All Others Similarly Situated; Genesee County Employees Retirement System, * * * * Appellees, * * v. * * Transaction Systems Architects, * Inc.; Dwight G. Hanson, * * Appellees, * * Greg Duman, * * Defendant, * * William E. Fischer; Edward Fuxa, * * Appellees, * * Harlan F. Seymour, * * Defendant, * * James J. Hayes, * * Appellant, * * David Russel, * * Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: August 7, 2008 Filed: August 13, 2008 ___________ -2- Before MURPHY, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. In this securities class action lawsuit, class member James Hayes appeals the district court s1 order approving a settlement and its judgment of dismissal. Because Hayes did not timely raise (if at all) in the district court the issues he argues on appeal, we do not consider them. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. -3-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.