Jeffrey S. Gundersen v. W. I. LeBlanc, No. 06-2722 (8th Cir. 2007)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Prisoner case - habeas. Dismissal of Section 2241 petition affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-2722 ___________ Jeffrey S. Gundersen, Appellant, v. W. I. LeBlanc, Warden, FMCRochester, Appellee. * * * * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. * * [UNPUBLISHED] * * ___________ Submitted: July 17, 2007 Filed: July 20, 2007 ___________ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Jeffrey Gundersen appeals the district court s1 order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Having carefully reviewed the record, we agree with the district court that the record did not support a due process violation arising from the disciplinary proceedings at issue. See Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 45457 (1985) (describing process required when prison disciplinary hearing may result 1 The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Raymond L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. in loss of good-conduct time); Hill v. Morrison, 349 F.3d 1089, 1091 (8th Cir. 2003) (de novo standard of review for dismissal of § 2241 petition). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
